Intangiblia™
#1 Podcast on Goodpods - Intellectual Property Indie Podcasts
#3 Podcast on Goodpods - Intellectual Property Podcast
Plain talk about Intellectual Property. Podcast of Intangible Law™
Intangiblia™
Zodiac Season, Litigation Rising
Can you copyright a horoscope, enhance a century-old tarot deck and claim protection, or assign your stage name and lose it in court? We open the year by charting the legal sky where creativity, belief, and branding intersect—and sometimes collide. From a syndicated astrologer’s claim that near-identical forecasts kept running without a license, to a software company’s short-lived effort to assert control over historical time zone data, we unpack the crucial line between ideas and expression, facts and creativity, public domain and protectable derivative work.
We also step into the studio with the icons. The Walter Mercado saga reveals how a personal brand can be transformed into a trademark owned by someone else, with lasting consequences for the artist behind it. Along the way, we explore what separates simple restoration from original creativity in tarot publishing, why databases of raw facts remain free for all, and how small wording choices in daily horoscopes can carry real legal weight. The thread tying it all together: the cosmos is shared; the way we package it is not.
Expect practical takeaways for creators, publishers, and entrepreneurs: register original writing, document design decisions, start from public-domain sources rather than competitors’ upgrades, and read every clause before assigning names, logos, or likenesses. If you’re building an astrology app, launching a zodiac product line, or reviving classic esoteric art, this deep dive will help you navigate trademarks, copyrights, and contracts without dimming your creative light.
Enjoy the episode? Follow the show, share it with a friend who loves law or the stars, and leave a quick review to help others find us. What boundary do you think should exist between shared culture and private ownership? Tell us—your take might shape a future episode.
Check out "Protection for the Inventive Mind" – available now on Amazon in print and Kindle formats.
The views and opinions expressed (by the host and guest(s)) in this podcast are strictly their own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the entities with which they may be affiliated. This podcast should in no way be construed as promoting or criticizing any particular government policy, institutional position, private interest or commercial entity. Any content provided is for informational and educational purposes only.
We are at the start of Aquarius season. A good time for invention, disruption, and asking strange questions, like whether you can trademark a zodiac candleline called Scorpio sunrise, or copyright your weekly horoscopes, or sue someone for copying your astrology app's birth chart system. Can you own a star sign? Can someone really claim intellectual property over the moon's placement? The concept of Mercury retrograde or the personality of a Leo? Apparently, yes. Or at least they've tried. And if you're wondering, yes, this whole episode might be a Pisces idea, which explains a lot. Today on Intangibilia, horoscopes, tenor, astrology software, and the legal battles where celestial symbols crash into copyright law. This isn't about belief, it's about ownership. And what happens when someone looks up at the stars and says, That's mine.
Speaker 1:You are listening to Intangibilia, the podcast of intangible law. Plain tug about intellectual property. Please welcome your host, Leticia Caminero.
Leticia AI:Welcome to our first episode of the year. We're starting with the Zodiac because this is the month when everyone's thinking about the future. A fresh calendar, a little cosmic guidance. What better time for some legally infused fortune telling? Welcome back to Intangibilia, the podcast where we explore how intellectual property law collides with creativity, technology, and the stories we tell ourselves. I'm Leticia Caminero.
Artemisa:And I'm Artemisa. New Year, New Voice. Today we're entering a space where mythology, branding, and belief all get tangled up in legal arguments. Horoscopes, tarot decks, astrology apps, zodiac themed product lines. People are claiming ownership over them. And the courts, sometimes they agree. No crystal balls, no planets in alignment, just copyright claims, cease and desist letters, and trademark registrations. It's mysticism with a paper trail.
Leticia AI:Quick reminder before we begin: this episode was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence. All legal analysis, structure, and final editorial decisions are human-led. Now let's look to the stars through the lens of the law. Let's start small, newspaper small, horoscopes. You've seen them at the back of magazines or in your daily feed. Pisces, be cautious today. Leo, fortune's headed your way. They seem casual, even disposable. But one Canadian astrologer showed they're also copyrightable.
Artemisa:Christine Davison wrote horoscopes syndicated by a licensing agency to newspapers across Canada. In 2011, her words kept appearing in one major newspaper chain even after their contract ended. Except she wasn't getting paid, and the texts were suspiciously similar to hers.
Leticia AI:Her team sued. The claim that the paper lifted horoscope material from her earlier work or from a website where she posted similar content, then kept publishing it under her name. Essentially, same vibe, same format, allegedly the same phrasing, just no license.
Artemisa:So wait, they booted her, then recycled her own star forecasts without asking. That's a cosmic betrayal.
Leticia AI:The lawsuit leaned on a key IP principle. You can't copyright general ideas like Mercury retrograde causes delays. But you can copyright how you write about it. Davison's style, word choices, and phrasing, those were original expressions.
Artemisa:It didn't go to trial, so we don't have a court ruling, but it raised the flag, yes, horoscopes are entertainment. But they're also authored writing. And the law protects creative writing, even if it's predicting your love life based on the moon.
Leticia AI:Bottom line, if you copy someone's exact horoscope text, it's not just plagiarism. It's potentially copyright infringement. Even if it's mystical, it's still authored content.
Artemisa:Now for something more technical, time itself. Because what's astrology without precise timing? That's where software comes in.
Leticia AI:In 2011, a company called AstroLabe, known for its astrology software, sued the maintainers of the public time zone database, the thing that helps computers know what time it is in different parts of the world. Their claim that the database had copied data from their proprietary astrology atlas.
Artemisa:Wait, they tried to copyright the time of day?
Leticia AI:Not the time itself, but the historical time zone information. Like when certain countries changed daylight saving rules, AstroLabe had spent years compiling it for astrologers. But that's the catch. Factual data, like time zone shifts, isn't copyrightable. The lawsuit was widely criticized.
Artemisa:The Electronic Frontier Foundation even stepped in to defend the database team. They called the lawsuit an attempt to monopolize public data. And thankfully, Astrolabe dropped the case soon after.
Leticia AI:It's a good reminder. Copyright protects creativity, not raw facts. The way you write about something, sure. But not the thing itself. You can't own time, no matter what your rising sign says.
Artemisa:A cosmic miscalculation, legally speaking, tarot time. You've probably seen the classic ride await deck, The Fool, the Hermit, Death. It's over a hundred years old, and the original illustrations are in the public domain. But what if you digitally enhance those images and sell your own version?
Leticia AI:That's the question at the heart of a dispute between two companies, Siren Imports and VHNS. Siren sells a version of the Riderweight deck with updated colors, cleaned up lines, and some new graphic elements. Then VHNS released their own edition and Siren cried copycat.
Artemisa:Siren claimed that VHNS wasn't just using the original public domain art, but was copying Siren's enhancements, like their color choices and layout. VHNS argued back, no, we just started from the same public domain base. You don't own color correction.
Leticia AI:And here's where copyright law steps in again. Simple restoration or tweaks might not be enough to create a new protectable work. The courts look for a modicum of creativity, not effort, creativity.
Artemisa:So if you just cleaned up old art, that's not protectable. But if you added new design flourishes or redrew parts in a distinctive way, that might be.
Leticia AI:This case is still ongoing in the US Copyright Claims Board. It's small claims IP court, but the issue is big. When does a refresh of public domain art become original enough to protect?
Artemisa:It's a modern publishing standoff, mystical edition. And it shows how old symbols can still spark new disputes.
Speaker 1:Intangibilia, the podcast of intangible law. Plain tug about intellectual property.
Leticia AI:Walter Mercado was a cultural phenomenon. A Puerto Rican astrologer turned TV icon whose flamboyant capes and daily horoscopes became a staple of Latino households.
Artemisa:He was the voice of comfort and glittery wisdom across the Americas.
Leticia AI:Mercado built a brand around his mystique. He even took the stage name Shanti Ananda later on, but for most of his career he was simply Walter Mercado, synonymous with Heartfelt Astrology.
Artemisa:A name like that was his trademark.
Leticia AI:And legally it was a trademark. In June 1995, Walter Mercado signed a contract with Bart Enterprises International, a production company. Under that deal, he assigned the rights to the Walter Mercado trademark, his name and likeness to Bart Enterprises. In plain terms, Bart got the right to produce and sell any material using his brand. In exchange, Walter was promised regular payments, $25,000 a month plus allowances.
Artemisa:So he essentially gave them his identity.
Leticia AI:Yes. The courts later emphasized it wasn't a temporary license but an assignment in perpetuity. Bart became the legal owner of the trademark. Walter's name wasn't on loan, he literally handed over the keys to his own brand.
Artemisa:That sounds like selling the steering wheel of your car and then being told you can't drive it.
Leticia AI:Exactly. And that's what happened. For about eleven years, the partnership ran smoothly. Then, around 2006, things fell apart. Walter stopped producing content, and Bart stopped paying. Walter claimed unpaid fees and tried to terminate the contract. Bart countered that he had breached the agreement by walking away. Soon both sides were in court, Bart suing in Florida and Walter countersuing in Puerto Rico.
Artemisa:Uproar in the cosmos. How did the court see it?
Leticia AI:The Florida jury found that Bart did not breach the contract, but Walter had by abandoning it. More crucially, both the district judge and the First Circuit Court held that Walter had no valid termination. Since he hadn't fulfilled his obligations, Bart was relieved of payment. And because the assignment hadn't been undone, Bart still owned the trademark.
Artemisa:That sounds cruel. Did the courts actually bar him from using his own name?
Leticia AI:They did. Because Bart had a legal assignment of the Walter Mercado name and no valid termination had occurred, the court issued an injunction barring Walter from using his own stage name in commerce. The judge ruled that continued use of the name would likely cause confusion among the public.
Artemisa:So he was legally Walterless.
Leticia AI:It was that stark. At one point, the court even quoted the lyrics from Aquarius, when the moon is in the seventh house, peace will guide the planets, and said there was no peace and love between these parties.
Artemisa:Wow. So he went public as Shanti Ananda to get around it.
Leticia AI:Yes, he adopted Shanti Ananda, a spiritual name he had chosen earlier. But it was tough. The new name didn't carry the brand recognition, and legally he couldn't promote or profit from his old identity.
Artemisa:In the end, what's the tally?
Leticia AI:The case ended in 2012 with the court ruling against Walter. Bart Enterprises retained the trademark rights. No settlement gave him back control. Legally, he could not use Walter Mercado in a commercial context. Bart even held registered trademarks in the US and Mexico under that name.
Artemisa:That's devastating. I'm for a legend of astrology.
Leticia AI:It is. Culturally, he remained beloved, but legally it was a cautionary tale. A public figure's name can become intellectual property. If you assign your name and likeness as a trademark, courts will uphold that assignment. Your identity, in legal terms, can be owned by someone else.
Artemisa:In other words, astrology itself isn't owned. Anyone can practice it. But your personal style and name, that's like copyrighted capes and registered titles in the legal universe.
Leticia AI:Precisely. Walter's case shows how trademarks and contracts can define or destroy a personal brand. It also highlights the importance of understanding the long-term consequences of assigning IP rights.
Artemisa:The stars didn't align for him. A bittersweet lesson. Even in astrology, earthly contracts rule the sky.
Leticia AI:Walter Mercado remains a cultural icon, with his portrait even housed in the Smithsonian. But legally, the name he made famous belonged to someone else for years.
Artemisa:His legacy lives in our hearts and horoscopes, even if a judge decided who got to use the name on the marquee.
Leticia AI:So can you own the zodiac? Not the stars themselves, of course. But how you write about them, how you package them, the decks, the designs, the names, the software, all of that lives in the realm of intellectual property.
Artemisa:It's wild, right? Something as old as the constellations, older than courts, older than copyright, now sits at the heart of trademark disputes and licensing deals.
Leticia AI:What these cases show us is that belief and branding can overlap. The moon doesn't belong to anyone, but the phrase moon manifestation method trademark, that might.
Artemisa:Whether it's a daily horoscope, a mystical mobile app, or Walter Mercado's stage name, the same question keeps coming up. Where does shared culture end and private ownership begin?
Leticia AI:As we start a new year under a new sky, that question feels especially timely. Intellectual property law wasn't written with astrologers or tarot readers in mind, but they're here, creating, publishing, protecting their work.
Artemisa:And sometimes fighting over it.
Leticia AI:We hope this episode helped you see IP law a little differently. Whether you're a skeptic or a true believer, one thing's clear.
Artemisa:Thanks for joining us under the stars, legally speaking.
Leticia AI:We'll be back soon with more collisions between law, creativity, and culture. Until then, protect your rights, read the terms, and maybe double check your rising sign.
Artemisa:And if Mercury is in retrograde, make a backup.
Leticia AI:See you next time on Intangiblia. One, horoscopes may seem ephemeral, but if they're written with originality, they're protected. Copy them too closely, and you might end up in court.
Artemisa:2. You can't copyright facts or time itself, but the way you present them matters. Even a time zone database can become the center of a legal storm if the data is claimed as proprietary.
Leticia AI:3. Public domain isn't a free-for-all. If you enhance or remix something old, make sure you add real creative value. Color correction alone might not cut it.
Artemisa:4. Your name and image aren't just personal, they can be trademarks. And once assigned in a contract, you might not be able to take them back, even if they're yours in spirit.
Leticia AI:5. Intellectual property law can feel distant from mysticism, but it shapes the way modern spirituality is packaged, sold, and protected. The stars may guide us, but the paperwork holds the power. That wraps our first episode of the year. If you enjoyed this look at the intersection of IP and the Zodiac, share it with a friend or your astrologer.
Artemisa:And if you're planning to launch your own cosmic brand this year, maybe talk to a lawyer before you print the mugs.
Leticia AI:You can find show notes, episode transcripts, and references at intangibilia.com. And as always, we'd love to hear your thoughts, questions, or zodiac themed legal dilemmas.
Artemisa:Send us a message. Preferably not during Mercury retrograde, but we'll take our chances.
Leticia AI:Until next time, stay creative, stay curious, and remember, even the stars need a copyright notice. Bah and as the great Walter Makado would say, mucho, mucho amor. Intro. Letitia, welcome to our first episode of the year. We're starting with the zodiac because this is the month when everyone's thinking about the future, a fresh calendar, a little cosmic guidance, what better time for some legally infused fortune telling? Welcome back to Intangiblia, the podcast where we explore how intellectual property law collides with creativity, technology, and the stories we tell ourselves. I'm Leticia Caminero, Artemisa, and I'm Artemisa. Today we're entering a space where mythology, branding, and belief all get tangled up in legal arguments. Horoscopes, tarot decks, astrology apps, zodiac themed product lines, people are claiming ownership over them. And the courts, sometimes they agree. No crystal balls, no planets in alignment, just copyright claims, cease and desist letters, and trademark registrations. It's mysticism with a paper trail. AI disclaimer. Leticia, quick reminder before we begin. This episode was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence. All legal analysis, structure, and final editorial decisions are human-led. Now, let's look to the stars through the lens of the law. Segment legal cases Horoscopes on Trial. Letitia Let's Start Small. Newspaper small horoscopes. You've seen them at the back of magazines or in your daily feed. Pisces, be cautious today. Leo, fortune's headed your way. They seem casual, even disposable, but one Canadian astrologer showed they're also copyrightable. Artemisa. Christine Davison wrote horoscopes syndicated by a licensing agency to newspapers across Canada. In 2011, her words kept appearing in one major newspaper chain even after their contract ended, except she wasn't getting paid and the texts were suspiciously similar to hers. Letitia. Essentially, same vibe, same format, allegedly the same phrasing, just no license. Artemisa, so wait, they booted her, then recycled her own star forecast without asking? That's a cosmic betrayal. Letia. The lawsuit leaned on a key IP principle. You can't copyright general ideas like Mercury retrograde causes delays, but you can copyright how you write about it. Davison's style, word choices, and phrasing, those were original expressions. Artemisa. It didn't go to trial, so we don't have a court ruling, but it raised the flag. Yes, horoscopes are entertainment, but they're also authored writing, and the law protects creative writing, even if it's predicting your love life based on the moon. Letitia. Bottom line, if you copy someone's exact horoscope text, it's not just plagiarism. It's potentially copyright infringement. Even if it's mystical, it's still authored content. The time zone tango, astrology software meets the law. Artemisa? Now for something more technical, time itself, because what's astrology without precise timing? That's where software comes in. Letitia. In 2011, a company called Astrolabe, known for its astrology software, sued the maintainers of the public time zone database, the thing that helps computers know what time it is in different parts of the world. Their claim? That the database had copied data from their proprietary astrology atlas. Artemisa, wait, they tried to copyright the time of day? Letitia. Not the time itself, but the historical time zone information. Like when certain countries changed daylight saving rules. Astrolabe had spent years compiling it for astrologers. But that's the catch. Factual data, like time zone shifts, isn't copyrightable. The lawsuit was widely complicated. Criticized. Artemisa, the Electronic Frontier Foundation even stepped in to defend the database team. They called the lawsuit an attempt to monopolize public data. And thankfully, Astrolabe dropped the case soon after. Leticia, it's a good reminder. Copyright protects creativity, not raw facts. The way you write about something, sure, but not the thing itself. You can't own time, no matter what your rising sign says. Artemisa. A cosmic miscalculation, legally speaking. Tarot cards and the public domain duel. Artemisa. Tarotime, you've probably seen the classic Rider Wait deck, The Fool, The Hermit, Death. It's over a hundred years old and the original illustrations are in the public domain, but what if you digitally enhance those images and sell your own version, Letitia? That's the question at the heart of a dispute between two companies, Siren Imports and VHNS. Siren sells a version of the Rider Wait deck with updated colors, cleaned up lines, and some new graphic elements. Then VHNS released their own edition and Siren cried copycat. Artemisa Siren claimed that VHNS wasn't just using the original public domain art, but was copying Siren's enhancements, like their color choices and layout. VHNS argued back no, we just started from the same public domain base, you don't own color correction, Leticia. And here's where copyright law steps in again. Simple restoration or tweaks might not be enough to create a new protectable work. The courts look for a modicum of creativity, not effort. Creativity Artemisa. So if you just cleaned up old art, that's not protectable, but if you added new design flourishes or redrew parts in a distinctive way, that might be. Leticia. This case is still ongoing in the US Copyright Claims Board, its small claims IP court. But the issue is big. When does a refresh of public domain art become original enough to protect? Artemisa. It's a modern publishing standoff, mystical edition, and it shows how old symbols can still spark new disputes. The case of Walter Mercado versus Bart Enterprises when the stars and contracts collide. Leticia, Walter Mercado was a cultural phenomenon, a Puerto Rican astrologer turned TV icon whose flamboyant capes and daily horoscopes became a staple of Latino households. Artemisa You all remember my abuela, Tia or Mom tuning in and hoping Walter's predictions would guide the family. He was the voice of comfort and glittery wisdom across the Americas. Leticia, Mercado built a brand around his mystique. He even took the stage name Shantiananda later on, but for most of his career he was simply Walter Mercado, synonymous with heartfelt astrology. Artemisa, a name like that was his trademark, Leticia, and legally it was a trademark. In June nineteen ninety five, Walter Mercado signed a contract with Bart Enterprises International, a production company. Under that deal, he assigned the rights to the Walter Mercado trademark, his name and likeness to Bart Enterprises. In plain terms, Bart got the right to produce and sell any material using his brand. In exchange, Walter was promised regular payments. twenty five thousand dollars a month plus allowances? Artemisa. So he essentially gave them his identity. Leticia. Yes. The courts later emphasized it wasn't a temporary license, but an assignment in perpetuity. Bart became the legal owner of the trademark. Walter's name wasn't on loan. He literally handed over the keys to his own brand. Artemisa, that sounds like selling the steering wheel of your car and then being told you can't drive it. Leticia Exactly. And that's what happened. For about eleven years the partnership ran smoothly. Then around two thousand six, things fell apart. Walter stopped producing content, and Bart stopped paying. Walter claimed unpaid fees and tried to terminate the contract. Bart countered that he had breached the agreement by walking away. Soon both sides were in court, Bart suing in Florida and Walter counter suing in Puerto Rico. Artemisa Uproar in the Cosmos How did the court see it? Leticia The Florida jury found that Bart did not breach the contract, but Walter had by abandoning it. More crucially, both the district judge and the first circuit court held that Walter had no valid termination. Since he hadn't fulfilled his obligations, Bart was relieved of payment. And because the assignment hadn't been undone, Bart still owned the trademark. Artemisa. That sounds cruel. Did the courts actually bar him from using his own name? Leticia, they did. Because Bart had a legal assignment of the Walter Mercado name and no valid termination had occurred, the court issued an injunction barring Walter from using his own stage name in commerce. The judge ruled that continued use of the name would likely cause confusion among the public. Artemisa, so he was legally Walterless. Letia, it was that stark. At one point the court even quoted the lyrics from Aquarius. When the moon is in the seventh house, peace will guide the planets, and said there was no peace and love between these parties. Artemisa Wow So he went public as Shanti Ananda to get around it. Letitia Yes, he adopted Shanti Ananda, a spiritual name he had chosen earlier, but it was tough. The new name didn't carry the brand recognition, and legally he couldn't promote or profit from his old identity, Artemisa. In the end, what's the tally? Leticia. The case ended in 2012 with the court ruling against Walter. Bart Enterprises retained the trademark rights. No settlement gave him back control. Legally, he could not use Walter Mercado in a commercial context. Bart even held registered trademarks in the US and Mexico under that name. Artemisa, that's devastating for a legend of astrology. Leticia, it is. Culturally he remained beloved. But legally, it was a cautionary tale. A public figure's name can become intellectual property. If you assign your name and likeness as a trademark, courts will uphold that assignment. Your identity in legal terms can be owned by someone else. Artemisa. In other words, astrology itself isn't owned, anyone can practice it. But your personal style and name, that's like copyrighted capes and registered titles in the legal universe. Letitia precisely. Walter's case shows how trademarks and contracts can define or destroy a personal brand. It also highlights the importance of understanding the long term consequences of assigning IP rights. Artemisa, the stars didn't align for him. A bittersweet lesson, even in astrology, earthly contracts rule the sky. Leticia. Walter Mercado remains a cultural icon, with his portrait even housed in the Smithsonian. But legally, the name he made famous belonged to someone else for years. Artemisa. His legacy lives in our hearts and horoscopes, even if a judge decided who got to use the name on the marquee. Conclusion Under the same sky, within the law. Letitia, so can you own the zodiac? Not the stars themselves, of course, but how you write about them, how you package them, the decks, the designs, the names, the software, all of that lives in the realm of intellectual property. Artemisa. It's wild, right? Something as old as the constellations, older than courts, older than copyright, now sits at the heart of trademark disputes and licensing deals. Leticia. What these cases show us is that belief and branding can overlap. The moon doesn't belong to anyone, but the phrase moon manifestation method trademark, that might Artemisa. Whether it's a daily horoscope, a mystical mobile app or Walter Micado's stage name, the same question keeps coming up. Where does shared culture end and private ownership begin? Leticia, as we start a new year under a new sky, that question feels especially timely. Intellectual property law wasn't written with astrologers or tarot readers in mind, but they're here, creating, publishing, protecting their work. Artemisa and sometimes fighting over it. Leticia, we hope this episode helped you see IP law a little differently. Whether you're a skeptic or a true believer, one thing's clear. Even in matters of fate, the fine print matters. Artemisa. Thanks for joining us under the stars, legally speaking. Leticia, we'll be back soon with more collisions between law, creativity, and culture. Until then, protect your rights, read the terms, and maybe double check your rising sign. Artemisa and if Mercury is in retrograde, make a backup. Letitia. See you next time on Intangibilia. Five takeaways. Leticia one. Horoscopes may seem ephemeral, but if they're written with originality, they're protected. Copy them too closely and you might end up in court. Artemisa two. You can't copyright facts or time itself, but the way you present them matters. Even a time zone database can become the center of a legal storm if the data is claimed as proprietary. Leticia. Public domain isn't a free-for-all. If you enhance or remix something old, make sure you add real creative value. Color correction alone might not cut it. Artemisa 4. Your name and image aren't just personal, they can be trademarks, and once assigned in a contract, you might not be able to take them back, even if they're yours in spirit. Letitia 5. Intellectual property law can feel distant from mysticism, but it shapes the way modern spirituality is packaged, sold, and protected. The stars may guide us, but the paperwork holds the power. Final outro. Letitia. That wraps our first episode of the year. If you enjoyed this look at the intersection of IP and the Zodiac, share it with a friend or your astrologer, Artemisa. And if you're planning to launch your own cosmic brand this year, maybe talk to a lawyer before you print the mugs. Letitia, you can find show notes, episode transcripts, and references at intangible.com. And as always, we'd love to hear your thoughts, questions, or zodiac-themed legal dilemmas. Artemisa, send us a message, preferably not during Mercury retrograde, but we'll take our chances. Letitia, until next time, stay creative, stay curious, and remember, even the stars need a copyright notice. Artemisa. Bye, Letitia. And as the great Walter Mercado would say, mucho, mucho amor.
Speaker 1:Thank you for listening to Intangibilia, the podcast of intangible lum. Plenty of about intellectual property. Did you like what we talked today? Please share with your network. Do you want to learn more about intellectual property? Subscribe now on your favorite podcast player. Follow us on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. Visit our website www.infanhelia.com. Copyright Letizia Caminet O to any too many. All rights reserve. This podcast is provided for information purposes only.
